Source note

Candidate ghosting

Ghosting runs both ways in hiring now. Candidates go silent on employers, employers go silent on candidates, and each makes the other worse. This note covers what the research says about how common ghosting is, where in the hiring funnel it happens, what is driving the rise, and the parts of it an employer can actually control.

The short answer

Ghosting is now common on both sides of hiring. Around half of job seekers report having been ghosted by an employer, with the figure rising year over year, and most HR professionals report being ghosted by candidates mid-process. It is worst at the front of the funnel, right after an application or a first screen, and it eases as candidates move deeper. The drivers most cited are within an employer's control: unclear communication, slow timelines, and frustrating processes. The fix is structural, a defined communication cadence, not a better closing line.

~48%
of job seekers say they were ghosted by an employer in the past year, up from about 38% the year before, per Criteria Corp.
88%
of HR professionals report losing contact with a candidate mid-process, per LiveCareer.
Reviewed to the TrueStep HR standard Last verified 24 June 2026 Every figure cites a primary source
The scale

It goes both ways, and it is getting worse

Candidate ghosting is when one side of the hiring process stops responding without notice, and it is no longer a fringe annoyance. On the candidate side, Criteria Corp's Candidate Experience Report found that roughly 48% of job seekers said they were ghosted by an employer in the past year, up from about 38% the year before, a three-year high. iHire's survey of job seekers put the share who have ever been ghosted by an employer at 53%. On the employer side, LiveCareer's survey of HR professionals found that 88% have lost contact with a candidate partway through the process, and 71% say it has gotten worse over the past year.

The two feed each other. As candidates experience more employer silence, they become readier to go silent in return, and the result is a hiring process where both sides increasingly expect to be left in the dark. SHRM's Talent Trends work lists candidates dropping out of processes among the top recruiting pain points, alongside too few qualified applicants and heavy competition.

Where it happens

Ghosting clusters at the front of the funnel

Ghosting is not evenly spread across the hiring process. It is heaviest at the very start and thins out as candidates invest more. iHire's data on when employers went silent shows the pattern clearly, and the practical reading is that the earlier stages are where most of the damage is done and where a simple acknowledgment would prevent the most harm.

When employers go silent, by stage
After applying
The largest drop-off point. Around 28% of ghosting happens right after the application goes in, the black-hole experience candidates describe most. An automated acknowledgment alone removes most of this.
After a screen
Still early, still high. Roughly 16% happens after an initial phone screen, where a candidate has now given real time and a non-response reads as a verdict they were never told.
After one interview
The most damaging tier. About 20% happens after a first interview, the point where a candidate has invested most and expects to hear something, and silence does the most reputational harm.
Deeper stages
Less common, more costly. Smaller shares occur after multiple rounds, after an assessment, and even after an offer, where each instance is rarer but burns a finalist you nearly hired.
Why it is rising

The causes are mostly process, not character

It is tempting to read ghosting as a decline in manners. The data points more at the system. The clearest accelerant is volume: AI tools let candidates mass-apply, which floods employers, and a Greenhouse survey found recruiter workloads rose about 26% in the final quarter of 2024. Overwhelmed recruiters respond to fewer people, candidates feel the silence, and the cycle tightens. When LiveCareer asked HR professionals why candidates ghost, the top reasons were ones employers shape directly.

Why candidates ghost, per HR professionals
Communication
The top reason. Around 54% pointed to a lack of clear communication from the employer. Silence from one side invites silence from the other.
Better offer
A real competitive loss. About 42% said the candidate received a better offer elsewhere, which speed and a strong process can sometimes beat.
Slow process
Largely self-inflicted. Roughly 39% pointed to a long or frustrating hiring process, the kind of delay that lets a faster employer win the candidate.
Second thoughts
Partly a clarity problem. About 27% said the candidate had second thoughts about the role, which a clearer, more honest picture of the job earlier can reduce.
What reduces it

The fix is a cadence, not a charm offensive

Because the biggest drivers are communication and speed, the levers that work are structural. A defined communication cadence, an automated acknowledgment on application, a set point by which every screened candidate hears back, a real timeline given at each stage, removes the silence that triggers most early ghosting. Tightening the process so it does not drag closes the window in which a faster competitor or simple fatigue pulls a candidate away. None of this is a closing trick. It is a process that does not leave people guessing.

There is a business reason to bother beyond filling the role. A ghosted candidate forms a poor impression of the company and, increasingly, shares it on social media and review sites. The same silence that loses one hire can quietly raise the cost of the next ten, because candidate experience is now visible to the rest of the market. Measuring where candidates drop out, and what each unfilled day costs, turns a vague problem into one you can manage.

Sources

Where these figures come from

Primary sources

  1. iHire, State of Online Recruiting and ghosting survey. The source for 53% of job seekers having been ghosted by an employer and the funnel breakdown of when employers go silent, from a survey of over 1,000 candidates in October 2025. ihire.comChecked 24 June 2026
  2. Criteria Corp, 2025 Candidate Experience Report. The source for roughly 48% of job seekers being ghosted by an employer in the past year, up from about 38% the year before, a three-year high. criteriacorp.comChecked 24 June 2026
  3. LiveCareer, Candidate Ghosting and AI Report. The source for 88% of HR professionals losing contact with a candidate mid-process, 71% saying it has worsened, and the breakdown of why candidates ghost, from a survey of more than 900 HR professionals in March 2025. livecareer.comChecked 24 June 2026
  4. SHRM, Talent Trends. The source for candidates dropping out of hiring processes ranking among the top recruiting pain points, alongside too few qualified applicants and heavy competition. shrm.orgChecked 24 June 2026
  5. Greenhouse, recruiter workload survey. The source for recruiter workloads rising about 26% in the final quarter of 2024 as AI-driven mass applications flooded hiring teams. greenhouse.comChecked 24 June 2026

Ghosting figures vary by survey population and method, so the numbers here are best read as the consistent direction across studies rather than precise constants. The right communication cadence and where to tighten a hiring process depend on your roles, your volume, and your tools. This note is general information to support hiring practice, not a prescription.

Put it to work

Tools that close the silence and measure the funnel

Questions

Common questions

It is common on both sides. Criteria Corp found roughly 48% of job seekers were ghosted by an employer in the past year, up from about 38% the year before, and iHire put the share ever ghosted at 53%. On the employer side, LiveCareer found 88% of HR professionals have lost contact with a candidate mid-process, with 71% saying it has worsened.

At the front. iHire's data shows the largest share of employer ghosting happens right after an application, around 28%, followed by after a first interview, about 20%, and after an initial phone screen, roughly 16%. It eases at deeper stages, though ghosting after multiple rounds or even after an offer still occurs and is more costly when it does.

When LiveCareer asked HR professionals, the top reasons were a lack of clear communication from the employer, around 54%, a better offer elsewhere, about 42%, a long or frustrating hiring process, roughly 39%, and second thoughts about the role, about 27%. Most of these are things an employer can shape with a clearer, faster, more communicative process.

With structure, not charm. Set a communication cadence, an automated acknowledgment on application, a point by which every screened candidate hears back, and a real timeline at each stage, so candidates are not left guessing. Tighten the process so it does not drag and lose people to a faster competitor. Because the biggest drivers are communication and speed, fixing those removes most of the early ghosting.

This note is general information to support planning, not legal or financial advice. Benchmarks are starting points, not rules. Confirm the figures and how they apply to your situation before acting on them.

See where your hiring funnel leaks

The free HR Operating System Readiness Scorecard profiles your hiring setup, then shows where candidates are most likely to drop out. No sign-up to see your profile.

Take the free scorecard →