Compliance kit

AI Hiring and HR Governance Kit

Put working governance around the AI in your hiring: a policy you adopt, notices candidates get before a tool runs, vendors held to their audit results, and the four-fifths check run on your own numbers.

$129USD

One-time purchase, no subscription. Instant download.

Built by expert HR practitioners and leaders

  • AI hiring use policy: twelve adoptable sections covering scope, human oversight, bias testing, notice, records, vendors, and prohibited uses
  • Five candidate notices: copy-ready Options A to E, from a one-line statement to the 10-business-day advance notice and the video-interview consent
  • Vendor bias-audit request: a ready-to-send letter with the ten-item ask and a response grid for the vendor to complete
  • Adverse-impact review memo: documents the four-fifths review, the findings, and the action taken, with the table built in
  • Six-tab governance tracker: tool inventory, the bias-audit schedule, the four-fifths log, the candidate notice log with the business-day count, and a governance record
  • Web assessment and Start Here guide: check your hiring against the rules and see which obligations each location triggers

The kit organizes the governance and keeps the record. It does not determine that a tool complies and does not replace counsel review.

One-time purchase Instant download Editable files 14-day guarantee

Templates, a tracker, and general business information for planning, not legal or tax advice. The rules for AI in hiring vary by place and change quickly, so confirm edge cases with employment counsel.

Not the right fit? Take the 60-second match.

Last reviewed June 2026

Buying for clients or multiple entities? The White-Label tier is in the license.

One-time purchaseNo subscription
Instant downloadFiles you keep
Editable filesExcel, Word, PDF
14-day guaranteeMoney back
Secure checkoutSSL encrypted
What you get

Seven pieces that put governance around every tool

A policy you adopt, notices you paste in, a letter that holds vendors to account, a memo that documents the math, and a tracker that keeps the whole record. Built to be used together.

PDFStart here

Start Here

What each piece does, the order to use them, and the rules the kit tracks in plain language. One page, read it first.

DOCXWord + PDF

AI in Hiring Use Policy

A twelve-section internal policy you adapt and adopt: scope and definitions, principles, the tool inventory, human oversight, bias and adverse-impact testing, candidate notice, records, vendor management, roles, prohibited uses, and the review schedule. A plain definitions table settles what counts as a covered tool.

DOCXWord + PDF

AI Candidate Notice

Five copy-ready notices, Options A to E: a one-line statement, wording that names what the tool assesses and offers an alternative, a human-review version, the video-interview notice and consent, and the advance notice with the 10-business-day lead time. Each carries accommodation contact language.

DOCXWord + PDF

Vendor Bias-Audit Request

A ready-to-send letter asking each vendor for its most recent bias-audit results, methodology, data categories, selection rates and impact ratios, known limitations, and how it supports notice and accommodation, with a response grid for the vendor to complete and a reply-by date.

DOCXWord + PDF

Adverse-Impact Review Memo

An internal memo that documents a four-fifths review of a tool or hiring round: the selection-rate table, the findings, the action taken, and a sign-off line. A flagged result is framed as a screen for a closer look, not a verdict.

XLSXExcel

Governance Tracker

Six tabs: a Start Here, the AI tool inventory, the bias-audit tracker with the next-audit date calculated, the adverse impact log that runs the four-fifths math, the candidate notice log with the business-day count, and a governance log for approvals and reviews. Opens on a worked example. Works in Excel or Google Sheets.

HTMLWeb tool

Governance Assessment

Check your hiring against the bias-audit, notice, and human-oversight rules in any browser, and see which obligations each of your locations triggers. Its result is a self-assessment, not a compliance determination.

How it works

The method in the order governance runs

Scope first, policy second, then the checks and the record. The kit structures and documents; counsel makes the close calls.

STEP 01

Confirm what you use and where

List every tool that screens, scores, ranks, or assesses candidates, and check which places apply: New York City, Illinois, California, Colorado, the EU, plus federal law everywhere. The Start Here and the assessment walk through it.

STEP 02

Inventory the tools, adopt the policy

One row per tool in the tracker, an owner named for each, and the use policy adapted and adopted, setting the oversight, notice, and recordkeeping rules your team follows.

STEP 03

Run the checks

Run the four-fifths check on your own selection data, send each vendor the bias-audit request, and give candidates the right notice before a tool is used.

STEP 04

Log it and review on a schedule

Record audits, notices, approvals, and decisions in the tracker. Review at least yearly and whenever a law changes or a tool is added, and take the edge cases to counsel.

The standard

One structure for a patchwork of rules, honest about its limits

There is no single law for AI in hiring, so the kit names the rules it tracks, dates its review, and is clear about where counsel takes over.

No single law covers AI in hiring. A set of federal, state, city, and international rules overlap, and the kit gives you one structure built to meet whichever ones reach you.
Never a stand-in for legal advice. The templates and the tracker mark the legal checkpoints, from a failing impact ratio to whether a tool counts as AI, and tell you when to route the call to employment counsel.
The rules it tracks, named. New York City Local Law 144, the Illinois Human Rights Act and AI Video Interview Act, California's FEHA automated-decision rules, Colorado's SB 26-189, the EU AI Act, and the federal four-fifths screen, framed as a reference to confirm, not a guarantee.
A worked example to follow. The tracker opens on a filled-in tool, so you see the inventory, the audit dates, the four-fifths math, and the notice count working before you log your own.
Dated and reviewable. Every file carries a last-reviewed date, the policy sets an annual review, and the governance log keeps the record of who approved what, and when.

The kit tells you when to call a lawyer

AI hiring rules look mechanical until a case sits near a line. The checkpoints below are marked in the templates and the tracker, so you slow down before a tool, or a decision about one, creates exposure. Advice early is far cheaper than a charge later.

A tool whose impact ratio lands below 0.80 Whether a borderline tool counts as AI or automated under each law Pausing, fixing, or keeping a tool after a flagged result Denying a requested accommodation or human-review alternative What Colorado's 2027 rules and the EU AI Act require you to build now A complaint, an agency inquiry, or an audit demand about a tool

Who does what

Working governance splits the load between you, the kit, and your counsel. Here is the split, stated plainly.

  • The kit drafts the policy; you adopt it. The twelve sections carry the standards and the coaching notes. The owners, the review dates, and the final wording are your calls, with counsel on the last read.
  • The kit words the notices; you give them. Five options cover the normal cases. Placing the right one where candidates see it, before the tool runs, is the part only you can do.
  • The tracker runs the four-fifths math; counsel reads a failing ratio. The log calculates the rates and flags anything below 0.80. A flag is a screen for a closer look, and what happens next is a legal call.
  • The letter asks the vendor; your contract holds them to it. The request gets the audit results, methodology, and limitations on file. The contract terms that bind the vendor are counsel territory.
  • The kit keeps the record, and the record is the point. An inventory, dated audits, logged notices, and documented decisions are the difference between a clean answer and a scramble when someone asks.
Is this for you

Who it's built for

Who this kit fits, and where to go if that's not you.

Built for

  • An HR team running resume rankers, automated scoring, chatbot screeners, or AI video analysis, with no governance structure around them yet.
  • A company hiring into New York City, Illinois, California, or Colorado, or employing in the EU, that needs the notice, audit, and oversight rules handled in one place.
  • A team that has to answer a board, customer, or counsel question about how its AI hiring is governed, and needs the policy and the paper trail to show for it.

If you are looking for

Questions

Before you buy

What format are the files and can I edit them?
One Excel tracker, four Word templates that also ship as PDFs, a Start Here PDF, and a web assessment that opens in any browser. The tracker works in Excel or Google Sheets, everything is editable, and the files are yours to keep.
Is this legal advice?
No. It is general information and a self-review structure for planning. The kit marks where to bring in employment counsel, and it does not determine that any tool or process complies. Take edge cases, and any tool that flags below the four-fifths line, to counsel before you act.
Which rules does the kit track?
There is no single law for AI in hiring, so the kit tracks the common requirements: New York City Local Law 144, the Illinois Human Rights Act and AI Video Interview Act, California's FEHA automated-decision rules, Colorado's SB 26-189, federal Title VII, the ADA, and the ADEA with the four-fifths screen, and the EU AI Act. Each file names its sources and carries a last-reviewed date.
What counts as an AI or automated tool here?
The policy uses a plain definition: a machine-based system that infers from its input to produce a score, ranking, recommendation, or decision used in hiring. Resume rankers, automated scoring, matching algorithms, chatbot screeners, and AI analysis of video interviews usually qualify. A plain keyword filter or an applicant database that only stores records usually does not. The close calls go to counsel.
What is the four-fifths rule?
Divide each group's selection rate by the rate of the group selected most often. A result below 0.80 flags a potential adverse impact that needs a closer look. It is a screen, not a verdict, and a flagged result is not proof of discrimination on its own. The tracker runs the math and the memo documents the review.
We only use one resume-screening tool. Do we still need this?
The obligations attach to the tool, not the count. One screening tool used in New York City still needs the independent bias audit, the posted summary, and the advance notice; one video-analysis tool in Illinois still needs notice, an explanation, and consent. The kit is the same amount of structure whether you govern one tool or ten.
Does it cover the New York City notice timing?
Yes. Notice Option E gives the advance-notice wording, and the tracker's candidate notice log counts the business days between notice and use and checks the result against the 10-business-day minimum. The count excludes weekends but not public holidays, so the log tells you to treat a result at exactly 10 as marginal and add lead time when a holiday falls in the window.
Colorado and the EU rules are not in force yet. Why set up now?
Colorado's SB 26-189 takes effect January 1, 2027, and the EU AI Act's high-risk hiring obligations were deferred to December 2, 2027, pending formal adoption. Both expect an inventory, oversight, notice, and records, which take months to stand up. The kit builds that structure now, and each file carries a last-reviewed date so you can see how current it is as the rules move.
What is the refund policy?
Digital products are covered by a 14-day money-back guarantee. See the refund policy for the full terms.
What happens after I buy?
Checkout delivers an instant download link, and a receipt with the same link arrives by email. Open the Start Here page first; it tells you the order to work in. If a file gives you trouble, email support@truestephr.com.
Can I expense this purchase to my business?

Most customers buy TrueStep HR tools for business use, and a tool you use for work often qualifies as a deductible business expense. Whether it does for you depends on your situation, so confirm with your accountant or tax professional. Your receipt arrives by email at checkout and works as documentation.

Free guide

The 6 red flags to check before you discipline or fire someone

A five-minute screen that catches the most common and most expensive people-decision mistakes before they happen. Free PDF, sent to your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get the kit

Govern the tools before someone asks

The policy adopted, the notices out, the vendor audits on file, and the four-fifths check run, all in one documented record.

$129
One-time purchase, no subscription

Templates and self-review tools for planning, not legal or tax advice. Last reviewed June 2026.